1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

R217

Discussion in 'Test Server' started by trakilaki, Mar 22, 2019.

Dear forum reader,

if you’d like to actively participate on the forum by joining discussions or starting your own threads or topics, please log into the game first. If you do not have a game account, you will need to register for one. We look forward to your next visit! CLICK HERE
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trakilaki

    trakilaki Living Forum Legend

  2. couda22

    couda22 Padavan

    Advanced tooltips are enabled now.
    [​IMG]
    The only problem is that you can't see quality of gold enchantment compared to the maximum possible value of the gold enchantment. The percentage is calculated according to the overall maximum value (=maximum "platinum" value) of the enchantment.

    Mage changes:
    - fireball: skill 5pt talent -> 25% damage per second
    - Singularity -> Synchronity skill -> it finally has reasonable description (the overall effect is the same, but tick the rate and CD reduction has been adjusted)

    Ranger changes:
    - explosion of explosive arrow deals PHYSICAL damage now (not fire damage)
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2019
  3. trakilaki

    trakilaki Living Forum Legend

    Another useless feature just like CV.
    It is broken too ... It shows 0% armor on values over 85%
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  4. _Baragain_

    _Baragain_ Living Forum Legend

    So they need to work the kinks out, but I wouldn't call it as useless as the CV system (nothing can be that useless)... As the local math expert, I'm looking forward to this change.

    Please tell me that the pets that you can buy from the merchant for gold are not eligible for this. Otherwise, 400 gold means at least one creserite, and one could upgrade a pet fully for 32k gold.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2019
    michlong3 and TwiliShadow like this.
  5. trakilaki

    trakilaki Living Forum Legend

    Pet is a pet ... no matter where you get it from :D
    Yes you can buy it and turn it to crescerite
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  6. _Baragain_

    _Baragain_ Living Forum Legend

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    michlong3, TwiliShadow and sargon234 like this.
  7. sargon234

    sargon234 Forum Overlooker

    isn't terribly exploitable?There's no way something like this is going to make it to live
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  8. MikeyMetro

    MikeyMetro Forum Overlooker

    Ummm... so what? 32K gold is a huge amount for an average player. Particularly for toons that are not done or near done crafting. And if a toon is done crafting then maxing a few pets takes them from what? OP in PvE to a bit more OP?
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  9. TwiliShadow

    TwiliShadow Board Analyst

    Gee, wouldn't that qualify as a bug exploitation???

    They've punished and/or eliminated access for much harder, more difficult to accomplish "exploits". Just saying.
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  10. stegon

    stegon Forum-Apprentice

     
    michlong3 and vegetadavid like this.
  11. Selene-Rip

    Selene-Rip Forum-Apprentice

  12. Dемои

    Dемои Someday Author

    Ok but how to get these eggs mounts? Next event for realm fragments?
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  13. westernranger

    westernranger Someday Author

    [​IMG]

    Exo pet => 5 Crescerite
     
    michlong3 likes this.
  14. trakilaki

    trakilaki Living Forum Legend

  15. Hetsunien

    Hetsunien Advanced

    I guess we'll have to constantly buy the Andermant buff to complete the event, what a surprise! -_-

    On the other hand, why are we melting pets in the workbench? Dev's laziness?? Was it too much work to add to the Mounts vendor an option to exchange 9 pets (like the melting tab of the Blacksmith) for crescerites?
     
    azeriatesi and _G_R_A_M_P_S_ like this.
  16. cdeepal

    cdeepal Forum Baron

    Thanks Traki for the preview.

    I cannot get my head around those percentage values or what they mean. The more I look at them, the more I get confused. May be it is too advanced for me.
     
  17. TwiliShadow

    TwiliShadow Board Analyst

    I'm going to agree that this is a bit confusing. For both the top of possible gold should be 100% and platinum lines should show 100+%.

    Because none of these numbers are relavent to the range of what is normal, considering that the infernals drop things that are (ex:) 60-120% of normal. And now we have platinum above that.

    I can see where people that aren't math majors could get confused and wonder just how far can one get?

    I know the tables exist somewhere on max possible stats, but even I can never remember where.

    Umm.. Take a look at who you quoted...
     
  18. MaxDisappointed

    MaxDisappointed Forum Master

    It seems that turning the damage of the EA to physical is to anticipate the future so that the ranger does not use the bloodmage doll to kill grimmag quickly, for example, and the other mainly powerful abilities of other classes are not going to turn physical to avoid the use of certain pets like karabossa? xD
     
  19. cdeepal

    cdeepal Forum Baron

    I am not sure what You understood. I don't think these numbers are relevant to the maximum possible values.
    If that was their intention, then they definitely fell short of it.
    For example, look at the armor value of the boots listed 729 as 11%. We all know boots does not have a maximum armor value of 6627 in any tier.
     
  20. Arr

    Arr Forum Expert

    i tought it was fire but this is the description in r216

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page